CO-02 House winner?
Related terms
-
Democratic Party (United States) -
Republican Party (United States) -
United States House of Representatives -
Colorado -
Boulder, Colorado -
Front Range -
Joe Neguse
Total Volume
$34.8k
Kalshi $8.5k · Polymarket $26.3k
Leading Market
Joe Neguse
Kalshi 99% · Polymarket 99%
Joe Neguse Volume
$22.3k
Kalshi $2.2k · Polymarket $20.1k
Joe Neguse 24h Change
-4.00%
Kalshi 0.00% · Polymarket -4.00%
Calculate Your Potential Return
- Kalshi(opens in a new tab) 7.0% fee
- Polymarket(opens in a new tab) 5.0% fee
| Market | Kalshi Yes | Kalshi Fee | Kalshi Payout | Polymarket Yes | Polymarket Fee | Polymarket Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe NeguseDemocratic Party | 99.2¢ | 7.0% |
|
99.0¢ | 5% |
|
| Kelley Anne DennisonRepublican Party | — | — | — | 3.0¢ | 5% |
|
| Kelley DennisonRepublican Party | 2.1¢ | 7.0% |
|
— | — | — |
* Estimates if candidate wins. Actual returns may vary.
All Markets
Emerging News
Elections
Colorado’s 2026 midterms shape up as a Democratic-leaning cycle
PN Team • 2 weeks ago
Colorado, once a reliable Republican state, has leaned decidedly Democratic in recent cycles, and 2026 looks similar. Gov. Phil Weiser and Sen. John Hickenlooper are favored for easy wins over underfunded Republican opponents Victor Marx and Mark Baisley, with some GOP figures, including former Rep. Ken Buck, crossing over to back Weiser. The closest races are in the U.S. House: Democrat Manny Rutinel is seen as favored over Republican incumbent Gabe Evans in District 8, while Republican incumbent Jeff Crank is expected to hold District 5 against well-funded Democrat Jessica Killin despite backlash over the Space Command relocation. Analysts attribute the overall Democratic advantage to anti-Trump sentiment and weak Republican statewide recruitment.
Sources:
Sentiment
- John Hickenlooper Hickenlooper is portrayed as favored for an easy win in his Senate race.
- Phil Weiser Weiser is favored for an easy gubernatorial win, a positive reflection of his political standing.
- Democratic Party (United States) The Democratic Party is portrayed as favored to win across most races, reflecting a positive electoral outlook.
- Republican Party (United States) Republicans are described as underfunded and facing weak recruitment, suggesting a negative electoral outlook despite holding one district.
- Donald Trump Anti-Trump sentiment is cited as a factor boosting Democrats, implying a negative association for Trump's political standing.
- Colorado Colorado is discussed neutrally as the political landscape shifting toward Democrats.
- United States House of Representatives The U.S. House is mentioned factually as the chamber where the closest races occur.
- United States Senate The U.S. Senate is referenced factually regarding Hickenlooper's race.
Related Events
Related Events
Congress
Suspicious letters sent to lawmakers’ offices nationwide prompt FBI investigation
PN Team • 1 week ago
Arizona Democratic Reps. Greg Stanton, Yassamin Ansari and Adelita Grijalva reported suspicious letters, some containing unknown substances, sent to former office addresses, following a similar incident at Secretary of State Adrian Fontes' office that prompted an Arizona Capitol evacuation; the substance there proved non-hazardous. The FBI, U.S. Postal Inspection Service and U.S. Capitol Police confirmed a broader nationwide pattern, with over 800 suspicious envelopes sent to congressional and election offices. Colorado lawmakers including Sen. John Hickenlooper and Reps. Joe Neguse, Jason Crow, Brittany Pettersen and Diana DeGette also reported receiving or intercepting such letters. Staff were unharmed; officials called the mailings an intimidation attempt and vowed continued investigation.
Sources:
Sentiment
- Arizona Arizona is the site of the evacuation and multiple targeted offices, associating the state with the security incident.
- Adrian Fontes Fontes' office was targeted by a suspicious letter, a victim mention with slight negative association from the evacuation incident.
- Colorado Colorado is referenced as the location of multiple lawmakers targeted by the mailings.
- Greg Stanton Stanton is named as a victim of the suspicious mailings, a negative but passive association.
- Joe Neguse Neguse is listed among Colorado lawmakers targeted by the letters, a negative but passive mention.
- John Hickenlooper Hickenlooper is named as a recipient of suspicious mail, a negative but non-culpable association.
- United States The nationwide scope of the mailings implicates the broader U.S. political and security context.
- Democratic Party (United States) Democratic lawmakers were the victims of the mailings, a factual mention without reflecting on the party itself.
- Law enforcement Law enforcement is mentioned generically as part of the response effort.
Related Events
Related Events
Politics
House Judiciary report accuses Denver, Boulder of sanctuary policies endangering public safety
PN Team • 3 weeks ago
A House Judiciary Committee report released Oct. 9 by Chairman Jim Jordan accuses Denver and Boulder of "sanctuary" policies that undermine immigration enforcement, alleging local authorities have ignored detainers for people accused of serious crimes and that prosecutors have given immigration-related leniency in charging and plea decisions. The report singles out Denver District Attorney John Walsh and Boulder District Attorney Michael Dougherty, and notes Jordan previously subpoenaed Dougherty after he allegedly failed to turn over requested records. The committee is pushing for passage of the "Shutdown Sanctuary Policies Act" and estimates Denver has spent over $356 million on services for migrants.
Dougherty called the report a "political stunt" tied to the midterms, saying his office prioritizes justice and public safety. Denver Mayor Mike Johnston rejected the report's framing, saying Denver remains both a "safe city" and a "welcoming city" with falling crime and homelessness. Gov. Jared Polis maintains Colorado is not a sanctuary state, even as Denver and Boulder continue legal fights with the Trump administration over immigration-linked federal funding restrictions.
Sources:
Sentiment
- Boulder, Colorado Boulder is directly accused of sanctuary policies and its DA faces subpoena allegations, harming its reputation.
- Denver Denver is accused of costly sanctuary policies and legal battles with the federal government, though its mayor pushes back positively.
- Local government Local government officials and prosecutors are accused of sanctuary policies that undermine public safety enforcement.
- Law enforcement The report criticizes local authorities for allegedly ignoring detainers and law-enforcement cooperation with immigration enforcement.
- Colorado Colorado is mentioned amid disputes over sanctuary status, a mostly factual but slightly negative framing.
- United States House of Representatives Mentioned only as the parent body of the committee, with no direct characterization.
- United States The United States is referenced only as the federal government involved in funding disputes, a neutral factual mention.
Related Events
Related Events
Boulder Firebombing Suspect Pleads Guilty to Federal Hate Crimes
PN Team • 1 day ago
Mohamed Soliman pleaded guilty Thursday in federal court in Denver to 12 hate-crime counts stemming from the June 2025 firebombing attack on a pro-Israel walk at Boulder's Pearl Street Mall. Soliman, 47, is already serving a life sentence on state charges after the attack killed Karen Diamond, 82, and injured more than a dozen others, including a Holocaust survivor. Prosecutors are seeking an additional federal life sentence; sentencing is set for January 2. Soliman and his family, Egyptian nationals who entered the U.S. on tourist visas in 2022, had pending asylum claims at the time of the attack. His wife and children remain in a legal fight against deportation.
Sources:
Sentiment
- Boulder, Colorado Named as the site of a deadly firebombing attack, though the location itself is not blamed.
Related Events
Related Events
Climate
Supreme Court hears Boulder’s climate liability case against oil companies
PN Team • 4 weeks ago
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case brought by Boulder, Colorado, seeking damages from ExxonMobil and Suncor over claims the companies deceived the public for decades about fossil fuels' role in climate change. The justices are deciding only whether the lawsuit can proceed in state court, not whether the companies are liable, but the outcome could shape dozens of similar suits filed by municipalities nationwide.
The court's three liberal justices appeared sympathetic to Boulder, while Justice Brett Kavanaugh was the most vocal supporter of the energy companies' position. Chief Justice John Roberts raised concerns that a win for Boulder could trigger a wave of copycat lawsuits, but also pushed back on the companies' argument that such claims are governed solely by federal law. Justice Samuel Alito, who holds fossil fuel stock, recused himself, meaning a tie would leave the Colorado Supreme Court's ruling intact and let the case move forward. A decision is expected by late June or early July.
Sources:
Sentiment
- Boulder, Colorado Boulder is depicted as pursuing accountability against oil companies, a stance likely viewed favorably by many as standing up for climate concerns.
Related Events
Related Events
Elections
Hobbs and Biggs face off in high-stakes Arizona governor’s race
PN Team • 1 month ago
Arizona's 2026 governor's race pits Democratic incumbent Katie Hobbs against Republican Rep. Andy Biggs, with Green Party candidate Risa Lombardo and No Labels candidate Teri Ann Hourihan also on the ballot. Hobbs, who defeated Kari Lake in 2022, is emphasizing tax cuts, medical debt relief, and a tougher stance on immigration, while distancing herself from some national Democratic positions. Biggs, a longtime Trump ally and former House Freedom Caucus chair who backed efforts to block certification of the 2020 election results, has Trump's endorsement and support from Turning Point Action. Both campaigns are trading attack ads over child-sex-abuse legislation records.
Republicans hold a voter registration edge, but low turnout and Trump's sagging approval ratings could favor Democrats, echoing 2018's "Blue Wave." For the first time, each candidate has a running mate for a newly created lieutenant governor post: Biggs chose state Sen. Sine Kerr, while Hobbs picked former Republican Mesa Mayor John Giles, now an independent, to court centrist voters.
Sources:
Sentiment
- Andy Biggs Biggs is tied to blocking 2020 election certification and attack ads, casting a somewhat negative light.
- Katie Hobbs Hobbs is portrayed as a pragmatic incumbent emphasizing tax cuts and debt relief while broadening appeal.
- Donald Trump Trump's endorsement is noted alongside his sagging approval ratings, a mixed but leaning negative mention.
- Arizona Arizona is the neutral setting for the race, described factually.
- Democratic Party (United States) Hobbs is distancing herself from national Democratic positions, a mild neutral-to-negative framing for the party.
- Independent politician Giles is noted as now independent, a neutral factual detail.
- Republican Party (United States) Republicans hold a registration edge but face headwinds from Trump's sagging approval, a mixed portrayal.
- United States House of Representatives Biggs' House role is mentioned factually with reference to controversial 2020 election certification stance.
Related Events
Related Events
Elections
Douglas County voters to decide on expanding board of commissioners
PN Team • 4 weeks ago
Douglas County, Colorado voters will weigh in on Nov. 3 on whether to expand the Board of County Commissioners from three to five members and how those commissioners should be elected. A citizen-backed initiative, Ballot Question 200, asks whether to add two seats, which would bring the county in line with other populous Colorado counties like Arapahoe, Weld, El Paso and Adams. Question 201 asks how the expanded board should be chosen, either entirely by district or through a mix of district and at-large seats.
Complicating matters, the sitting Republican commissioners added cost-estimate language to Question 200 and introduced a competing Question 1A asking if all five commissioners should be elected at-large. Legal challenges to these additions failed. If 1A and 201 both pass, their conflicting election methods could trigger a court dispute. Supporters argue a growing population of 400,000 needs broader representation; opponents cite added costs, estimated between $500,000 and $1.3 million annually. If approved, five commissioners would first be elected in 2028.
Sources:
Sentiment
- Republican Party (United States) Republican commissioners added cost-estimate language and a competing ballot measure seen as complicating the citizen initiative, casting them in a mildly negative light.
- Colorado Colorado is factually referenced as the state context for the story.
- El Paso, Texas El Paso (County) is mentioned neutrally as a comparison point for county size, though the term refers to El Paso, Texas rather than the Colorado county.
Related Events
Related Events
Elections
Colorado Coalition Expands Poll Monitoring Amid Voter Intimidation Concerns
PN Team • 5 days ago
Ahead of Colorado's Nov. 3 election, the coalition Just Vote Colorado has recruited about 800 nonpartisan volunteers to staff polling locations, alongside an attorney-run election-protection hotline and faith leaders deployed to ease tensions. Organizers say the effort responds to heightened anxiety driven by President Trump's attacks on election integrity. Training covers spotting ICE activity and de-escalating confrontations, following an incident in Salida where activists reportedly linked to the Proud Boys harassed voters dropping off ballots. The Justice Department also plans to send federal monitors to Adams County. State officials, including Secretary of State Jena Griswold, say Colorado's elections remain secure and are proceeding normally.
Sources:
Sentiment
- Donald Trump Portrayed as the source of attacks on election integrity fueling voter anxiety.
- Colorado Setting for election-security concerns but officials affirm elections remain secure and normal.
Related Events
Related Events
Congress
Colorado lawmakers split on how to regulate AI
PN Team • 1 month ago
Colorado's congressional delegation is voicing growing concern over artificial intelligence, though members diverge on how—or whether—Washington should respond. Rep. Brittany Pettersen called for stronger industry standards, including independent audits and mandatory incident reporting. Sen. John Hickenlooper, who co-introduced bipartisan legislation on AI testing standards, warned the country is "entering a new and dangerous era" and urged the White House to address the technology's risks. Rep. Jason Crow echoed concerns about privacy and national security.
Sen. Michael Bennet argued Congress "will never be able to move fast enough" to regulate AI directly and instead proposed creating an independent federal agency for oversight. Republicans showed a different emphasis: Rep. Gabe Evans backed "common sense guardrails" and helped pass a House bill targeting AI data center costs, while also promoting American-made AI models over foreign competitors. Rep. Jeff Crank called for safety nets from AI companies themselves. The mixed responses highlight an unresolved national debate over federal AI oversight, with implications for markets tracking regulatory timelines and outcomes.
Sources:
Sentiment
- John Hickenlooper Hickenlooper is depicted as a proactive bipartisan leader warning of AI risks and co-introducing legislation.
- Jason Crow Crow is portrayed neutrally as raising legitimate concerns about privacy and national security.
- Colorado Colorado is mentioned as the setting for its delegation's policy debate without direct reputational effect.
- United States Congress Congress is mentioned neutrally as the body debating AI regulation.
- United States House of Representatives The House is referenced factually regarding a bill on AI data center costs.
Related Events
Related Events
Climate
Supreme Court to weigh Boulder County’s climate liability lawsuit against energy producers
PN Team • 1 month ago
The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County, a case testing whether local governments can use state tort law to seek damages from energy companies for climate-related harms tied to global carbon emissions. Boulder County filed its suit in Colorado state court in 2018, arguing that fossil fuel producers should pay damages for local impacts of climate change. It is one of dozens of similar suits filed by cities, counties, and states nationwide, including a $51.5 billion claim from Multnomah County, Oregon.
Critics argue these suits are an attempt to achieve carbon-tax-like outcomes through litigation rather than legislation, and that allowing them to proceed would let a single jurisdiction effectively dictate energy policy nationwide, raising energy costs for consumers. Supporters of the litigation maintain they seek only monetary damages, not regulatory changes. The Court's ruling could determine whether similar climate liability suits against the energy industry continue across the country, with major implications for energy markets and producers.
Sources:
Sentiment
- Colorado Colorado is mentioned only as the jurisdiction where the suit was originally filed, a neutral factual reference.
Related Events
Related Events
Related Events
CO-07 House winner?
Leading:
98.5%
Brittany Pettersen
Vol $31.5k
Colorado’s 4th District House Race 2026
Leading:
62.5%
Lauren Boebert
Vol $44.3k
CO-08 House winner?
Leading:
83.5%
Manny Rutinel
Vol $328.9k
CO-06 House winner?
Leading:
98%
Jason Crow
Vol $22.6k
CO-01 House winner?
Leading:
98.5%
Melat Kiros
Vol $7.2k
CO-03 House winner?
Leading:
64.5%
Jeff Hurd
Vol $8.9k
Colorado’s 5th Congressional District House Race 2026
Leading:
58.5%
Jeff Crank
Vol $24.1k
Colorado Senate winner?
Leading:
98.5%
John Hickenlooper
Vol $989.4k