Local & State
California lawmakers direct $1.3 billion in budget earmarks with little public scrutiny
PN Team • 2 months ago
California legislators quietly inserted $1.3 billion in earmarks into this year's state budget, funding projects from a Santa Barbara college gym renovation to a Marin County farmers market and a minor league baseball stadium in San Jose. The money, allocated through Assembly Bill 113, was added just days before the legislative session ended, with lawmakers keeping their individual requests confidential until after passage.
An analysis found more than 40% of the funds went to nonprofits, with Los Angeles and Santa Barbara counties—home to top Democratic leaders—receiving outsized shares, while many Republican-represented rural counties got little or nothing. Beneficiaries ranged from arts groups and museums to a mixed martial arts fighters' retirement fund and nonprofits with ties to Governor Gavin Newsom. Critics, including nonprofit advocates and taxpayer groups, say the closed-door process rewards political relationships over need, especially as the state confronts federal healthcare funding cuts. Legislative leaders defend the practice as a way to address urgent local needs efficiently, though even some lawmakers acknowledge the lack of transparency is problematic.
Sources:
Sentiment
- Gavin Newsom Newsom is named in connection with nonprofits tied to him benefiting from the secretive earmark process, a reputational negative.
- Democratic Party (United States) Democratic-controlled counties are described as receiving outsized shares of the funds, implying favoritism.
- Governor of California The Governor's office is mentioned as tied to nonprofits benefiting from the earmarks, implicating it in the controversy.
- Los Angeles Los Angeles County is cited as one of the areas receiving disproportionately large earmark funding tied to political relationships.
- California California as a state is the setting for this budget controversy involving lack of transparency.
- Republican Party (United States) Republican-represented rural counties are portrayed as being shortchanged, a mildly negative framing relative to fairness.